<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on web development and technologies by Peter Gasston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:50:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; CSS3 Properties with IE Fixes The Blog of Danma</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/#comment-43066</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; CSS3 Properties with IE Fixes The Blog of Danma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=649#comment-43066</guid>
		<description>[...] (reference: www.broken-links.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] (reference: <a href="http://www.broken-links.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.broken-links.com</a>) […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/#comment-37916</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 09:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=649#comment-37916</guid>
		<description>You can certainly do that in Mozilla browsers:

&lt;code&gt;background: { -moz-radial-gradient(20% 50%,circle,white,black 95%,transparent), -moz-radial-gradient(50% 20%,circle,black,white 95%,transparent), -moz-radial-gradient(10% 10%,circle,white,black 95%,transparent); }&lt;/code&gt;

The trick, as you can see, is to remember to set the last colour of each gradient to &#039;transparent&#039;; if you don&#039;t, the last set colour will fill the rest of the box and other gradients will be hidden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can certainly do that in Mozilla browsers:</p>
<p><code>background: { –moz-radial-gradient(20% 50%,circle,white,black 95%,transparent), –moz-radial-gradient(50% 20%,circle,black,white 95%,transparent), –moz-radial-gradient(10% 10%,circle,white,black 95%,transparent); }</code></p>
<p>The trick, as you can see, is to remember to set the last colour of each gradient to ‘transparent’; if you don’t, the last set colour will fill the rest of the box and other gradients will be hidden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik Wannheden</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/#comment-37905</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Wannheden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 22:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=649#comment-37905</guid>
		<description>While I certainlythink that Mozillas approach is easier, there&#039;s one thing that Webkit can do but I havn&#039;t seen or figured out to do in FireFox, and that&#039;s &quot;compound&quot; gradients. Can I have multiple gradients layered upon each other, like the WebKit example imaged here (the top top): http://i2.sitepoint.com/g/nl/tt/cssgradients.jpg

In WebKit this is done this way (where three gradients are layered on top of each other):
background:	-webkit-gradient(properties 1), -webkit-gradient(properties 2), -webkit-gradient(properties 3);

Is there a way to do this in Firefox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I certainlythink that Mozillas approach is easier, there’s one thing that Webkit can do but I havn’t seen or figured out to do in FireFox, and that’s “compound” gradients. Can I have multiple gradients layered upon each other, like the WebKit example imaged here (the top top): <a href="http://i2.sitepoint.com/g/nl/tt/cssgradients.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i2.sitepoint.com/g/nl/tt/cssgradients.jpg</a></p>
<p>In WebKit this is done this way (where three gradients are layered on top of each other):<br />
background:	–webkit-gradient(properties 1), –webkit-gradient(properties 2), –webkit-gradient(properties 3);</p>
<p>Is there a way to do this in Firefox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/#comment-36640</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=649#comment-36640</guid>
		<description>Hi, thanks for your kind comments. You can use multiple background images in Firefox 3.6; you just need to use comma-separated values for the property:

&lt;code&gt;background-image: gradient, gradient;&lt;/code&gt;

Just make sure your copy of Firefox is updated to 3.6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, thanks for your kind comments. You can use multiple background images in Firefox 3.6; you just need to use comma-separated values for the property:</p>
<p><code>background-image: gradient, gradient;</code></p>
<p>Just make sure your copy of Firefox is updated to 3.6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Type-Style</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/#comment-36639</link>
		<dc:creator>Type-Style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=649#comment-36639</guid>
		<description>Hey these two parts are awesome.
I really like it and read it more than 5 times to get everything in my head. 
I totally agree with you conclusion, but there is one problem I can´t solve at the moment.
You said, with a little help of TAB that firefox is able to show the right result with another gradient.
But i am unable to put 2 gradients in the background-image property.
How would it look like!

Thx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey these two parts are awesome.<br />
I really like it and read it more than 5 times to get everything in my head.<br />
I totally agree with you conclusion, but there is one problem I can´t solve at the moment.<br />
You said, with a little help of TAB that firefox is able to show the right result with another gradient.<br />
But i am unable to put 2 gradients in the background-image property.<br />
How would it look like!</p>
<p>Thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSS gradients for all web browsers, without using images - Robert&#39;s talk</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/#comment-36430</link>
		<dc:creator>CSS gradients for all web browsers, without using images - Robert&#39;s talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=649#comment-36430</guid>
		<description>[...] There are two great articles on this topic, delver deeper into the syntax differences: CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit and CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit (Part 2). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] There are two great articles on this topic, delver deeper into the syntax differences: CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit and CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit (Part 2). […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some links for light reading (01/12/09) &#171; davidmcdonald.dyndns.org:1973</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/#comment-36140</link>
		<dc:creator>Some links for light reading (01/12/09) &#171; davidmcdonald.dyndns.org:1973</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=649#comment-36140</guid>
		<description>[...] CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit (Part 2) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit (Part 2) […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/#comment-36029</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=649#comment-36029</guid>
		<description>@John Faulds: After investigating this further, seems like Safari doesn&#039;t like the font-weight property inside @font-face; I need to investigate this a little more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John Faulds: After investigating this further, seems like Safari doesn’t like the font-weight property inside @font-face; I need to investigate this a little more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Hogan</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/#comment-36025</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=649#comment-36025</guid>
		<description>Tab, I see now, sorry. In Part 1 it is made clear all the cool different box-model-aware sizing options in the new syntax. Very cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tab, I see now, sorry. In Part 1 it is made clear all the cool different box-model-aware sizing options in the new syntax. Very cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Hogan</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/30/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit-part-2/#comment-36024</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=649#comment-36024</guid>
		<description>Tab,

Please explain how the Webkit syntax does not have &quot;the ability to do gradients that depended on the box size.&quot; It certain seems to have that ability to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tab,</p>
<p>Please explain how the Webkit syntax does not have “the ability to do gradients that depended on the box size.” It certain seems to have that ability to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

