<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on web development and technologies by Peter Gasston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:50:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Un effet de gradient en CSS3 &#124; blog agence de communication marrakech</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/#comment-44162</link>
		<dc:creator>Un effet de gradient en CSS3 &#124; blog agence de communication marrakech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=624#comment-44162</guid>
		<description>[...] la syntaxe des gradients pour Firefox et Webkit, je vous conseille cet excellent post sur le blog Broken-links.    Posted in: Css &#160; Tags: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] la syntaxe des gradients pour Firefox et Webkit, je vous conseille cet excellent post sur le blog Broken-links.    Posted in: Css   Tags: […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Make a CSS3 Floating Follow Tab with Rollover Effects &#124; Tutoriali.com.hr</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/#comment-43339</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Make a CSS3 Floating Follow Tab with Rollover Effects &#124; Tutoriali.com.hr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=624#comment-43339</guid>
		<description>[...] &#097; handy comparison &#111;&#102; Mozilla&#8217;s &#097;&#110;&#100; WebKit&#8217;s gradient formats, &#097;&#110;&#100; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] a handy comparison of Mozilla’s and WebKit’s gradient formats, and […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/#comment-41488</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=624#comment-41488</guid>
		<description>@Type-Style: Yes, I&#039;ll update this post to reflect the change of syntax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Type-Style: Yes, I’ll update this post to reflect the change of syntax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Type-Style</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/#comment-41487</link>
		<dc:creator>Type-Style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=624#comment-41487</guid>
		<description>In the future this Problem is going to be solved.
http://webkit.org/blog/1424/css3-gradients/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the future this Problem is going to be solved.<br />
<a href="http://webkit.org/blog/1424/css3-gradients/" rel="nofollow">http://webkit.org/blog/1424/css3-gradients/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/#comment-37217</link>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=624#comment-37217</guid>
		<description>FWIW, the color problem reported above still seems to exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, the color problem reported above still seems to exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Un effet de gradient en CSS3 &#124; Blog de Johan BLEUZEN</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/#comment-36478</link>
		<dc:creator>Un effet de gradient en CSS3 &#124; Blog de Johan BLEUZEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=624#comment-36478</guid>
		<description>[...] la syntaxe des gradients pour Firefox et Webkit, je vous conseille cet excellent post sur le blog Broken-links.  Post&#233; dans CSS3  &#124;  Tags : CSS3, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] la syntaxe des gradients pour Firefox et Webkit, je vous conseille cet excellent post sur le blog Broken-links.  Posté dans CSS3  |  Tags : CSS3, […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSS gradients for all web browsers, without using images - Robert&#39;s talk</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/#comment-36429</link>
		<dc:creator>CSS gradients for all web browsers, without using images - Robert&#39;s talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=624#comment-36429</guid>
		<description>[...] are two great articles on this topic, delver deeper into the syntax differences: CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit and CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit (Part [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] are two great articles on this topic, delver deeper into the syntax differences: CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit and CSS gradient syntax: comparison of Mozilla and WebKit (Part […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/#comment-36415</link>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=624#comment-36415</guid>
		<description>Aye. I chatted with him.  He was of opinion the new proposal was too restrictive, but fact is, everything he challenged me to do w/ Firefox syntax I did w/ only a few minutes effort.

And, yes, it requires using things like multiple background-images, background-size, background-position, background-clip etc.

I see no problem w/ that.  Having a gradient syntax that repeats things you can already do w/ other parts of background-* seems rather redundant.

Anyway.  Whatever their concerns are, hopefully they don&#039;t change the core of the syntax.  We&#039;ve been finding the new proposal way way more useful than the old syntax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye. I chatted with him.  He was of opinion the new proposal was too restrictive, but fact is, everything he challenged me to do w/ Firefox syntax I did w/ only a few minutes effort.</p>
<p>And, yes, it requires using things like multiple background-images, background-size, background-position, background-clip etc.</p>
<p>I see no problem w/ that.  Having a gradient syntax that repeats things you can already do w/ other parts of background-* seems rather redundant.</p>
<p>Anyway.  Whatever their concerns are, hopefully they don’t change the core of the syntax.  We’ve been finding the new proposal way way more useful than the old syntax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/#comment-36413</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=624#comment-36413</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback, nemo. TBH my comments form needs to be properly re-designed, but I&#039;ve added the color into the stylesheet to fix the problem you mentioned.

You&#039;re right about the WebKit syntax, it only allows a decimal or percentage value.

According to &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28152&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this bug report&lt;/a&gt; the WebKit team are looking at the new syntax but have one or two concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback, nemo. TBH my comments form needs to be properly re-designed, but I’ve added the color into the stylesheet to fix the problem you mentioned.</p>
<p>You’re right about the WebKit syntax, it only allows a decimal or percentage value.</p>
<p>According to <a href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28152" rel="nofollow">this bug report</a> the WebKit team are looking at the new syntax but have one or two concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/11/26/css-gradient-syntax-comparison-of-mozilla-and-webkit/#comment-36410</link>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=624#comment-36410</guid>
		<description>BTW, your stylesheet specifies:

#commentform input[type=&quot;text&quot;]:focus, #commentform textarea:focus {
background-color:#FAEAE6;
}

without specifying a colour, so I get almost unreadable grey text on a pinkish background with my dark system theme.

For sites I visit a great deal I override bad behaviour in stylish, but it&#039;d be nice if you fixed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, your stylesheet specifies:</p>
<p>#commentform input[type=“text”]:focus, #commentform textarea:focus {<br />
background-color:#FAEAE6;<br />
}</p>
<p>without specifying a colour, so I get almost unreadable grey text on a pinkish background with my dark system theme.</p>
<p>For sites I visit a great deal I override bad behaviour in stylish, but it’d be nice if you fixed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

