 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discussing, implementing &amp; improving HTML5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broken-links.com/2009/01/08/discussing-implementing-improving-html-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/01/08/discussing-implementing-improving-html-5/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=discussing-implementing-improving-html-5</link>
	<description>Thoughts on web development and technologies by Peter Gasston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:24:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kroc Camen</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/01/08/discussing-implementing-improving-html-5/#comment-23146</link>
		<dc:creator>Kroc Camen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=306#comment-23146</guid>
		<description>Here’s my practical: http://camendesign.com
HTML5, no divs, no ids, no classes.

HTML5 can be used right now, if people are only interested. Whilst it won’t apply to all sites, in many situations (like a personal blog) IE support isn’t necessary. Would you seriously hold back from using HTML5 on an iPhone web app so that you had IE6 support???

I stopped making excuses for users and moved on. Write HTML5, use a JS hack for IE users, or even better, tell them to simply get a better browser; Chrome, Opera, Safari, FF, whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s my practical: <a href="http://camendesign.com" rel="nofollow">http://camendesign.com</a><br />
HTML5, no divs, no ids, no classes.</p>
<p>HTML5 can be used right now, if people are only interested. Whilst it won’t apply to all sites, in many situations (like a personal blog) IE support isn’t necessary. Would you seriously hold back from using HTML5 on an iPhone web app so that you had IE6 support???</p>
<p>I stopped making excuses for users and moved on. Write HTML5, use a JS hack for IE users, or even better, tell them to simply get a better browser; Chrome, Opera, Safari, FF, whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/01/08/discussing-implementing-improving-html-5/#comment-23144</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=306#comment-23144</guid>
		<description>Hi Bruce,

I did mention just over a year ago that most browsers will accept the new HTML 5 structural elements (&lt;a href=&quot;/2007/12/06/you-can-start-using-html-5-right-now/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;You Can Start Using HTML 5 Right Now!&lt;/a&gt;), but thanks for the more complete update.

However, I would be leery of relying on Javascript to make a page display correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bruce,</p>
<p>I did mention just over a year ago that most browsers will accept the new HTML 5 structural elements (<a href="/2007/12/06/you-can-start-using-html-5-right-now/" rel="nofollow">You Can Start Using HTML 5 Right Now!</a>), but thanks for the more complete update.</p>
<p>However, I would be leery of relying on Javascript to make a page display correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2009/01/08/discussing-implementing-improving-html-5/#comment-23141</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/?p=306#comment-23141</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter

it is possible to use some &lt;abbr&gt;HTML&lt;/abbr&gt; 5 now - see my blog post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/html-5-elements-test/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HTML 5 elements test&lt;/a&gt; in which I reference my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/tests/html5-elements.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;HTML&lt;/abbr&gt; 5 test page&lt;/a&gt; that shows  you can use some of the new structures, even in &lt;abbr&gt;IE&lt;/abbr&gt; 6!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter</p>
<p>it is possible to use some <abbr>HTML</abbr> 5 now — see my blog post <a href="http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/html-5-elements-test/" rel="nofollow">HTML 5 elements test</a> in which I reference my <a href="http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/tests/html5-elements.html" rel="nofollow"><abbr>HTML</abbr> 5 test page</a> that shows  you can use some of the new structures, even in <abbr>IE</abbr> 6!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
