<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE.Next to get a new layout engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on web development and technologies by Peter Gasston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-22775</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/#comment-22775</guid>
		<description>Does this mean it will pass the Acid 2 test?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean it will pass the Acid 2 test?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What will we see in IE.Next? &#187; Broken Links</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-3546</link>
		<dc:creator>What will we see in IE.Next? &#187; Broken Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/#comment-3546</guid>
		<description>[...] thing that&#8217;s certain is that we&#8217;ll see a new layout engine, which is more compliant with CSS 2.1. Does this mean it will pass the Acid 2 test? Will any of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] thing that’s certain is that we’ll see a new layout engine, which is more compliant with CSS 2.1. Does this mean it will pass the Acid 2 test? Will any of the […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/#comment-2454</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris, thanks for taking the time to answer. Obviously I have to cede to your knowledge on this one, as it&#039;s something your team have no doubt looked into many times. It just seems unnecessarily complicated that each version of IE requires its own independent machine to run efficiently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris, thanks for taking the time to answer. Obviously I have to cede to your knowledge on this one, as it’s something your team have no doubt looked into many times. It just seems unnecessarily complicated that each version of IE requires its own independent machine to run efficiently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-2452</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/#comment-2452</guid>
		<description>Peter, I&#039;ve talked before (http://blogs.msdn.com/cwilso/archive/2006/02/01/522281.aspx) about the multiple-ies-on-one-machine hacks.  They work, to a point - but they&#039;re not side-by-side independent IEs.  They tend to share, for example, networking stacks; they also don&#039;t have independent registrys (so they share settings, history, cache, etc. - which can be REALLY problematic if those are upgraded).  Doing it right - so these things aren&#039;t a problem - is hard, not trivial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, I’ve talked before (<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/cwilso/archive/2006/02/01/522281.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/cwilso/archive/2006/02/01/522281.aspx</a>) about the multiple-ies-on-one-machine hacks.  They work, to a point — but they’re not side-by-side independent IEs.  They tend to share, for example, networking stacks; they also don’t have independent registrys (so they share settings, history, cache, etc. — which can be REALLY problematic if those are upgraded).  Doing it right — so these things aren’t a problem — is hard, not trivial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Country’s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IE.Next aura un nouveau moteur de rendu</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>Country’s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IE.Next aura un nouveau moteur de rendu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 11:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/10/03/ienext-to-get-a-new-layout-engine/#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>[...] (Via Broken-Links) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] (Via Broken-Links) […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
