<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opacity in Internet Explorer 8 development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on web development and technologies by Peter Gasston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: css-resources</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/comment-page-1/#comment-31600</link>
		<dc:creator>css-resources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/#comment-31600</guid>
		<description>I am one of the webmasters that are ready to cry &quot;foul&quot; for the way IE8 pretended to go for standards compliance but then turned around and not only didn&#039;t support CSS3 opacity properties but added insult to injury with yet another opacity code abortion in IE8, to add to the already nasty IE 6 and IE7 abortions! Hypocrites! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of the webmasters that are ready to cry “foul” for the way IE8 pretended to go for standards compliance but then turned around and not only didn’t support CSS3 opacity properties but added insult to injury with yet another opacity code abortion in IE8, to add to the already nasty IE 6 and IE7 abortions! Hypocrites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/comment-page-1/#comment-13742</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/#comment-13742</guid>
		<description>Thank god for at last Explorer is finally giving them hypocrites some of their nonsense &quot;&quot;standards&quot;&quot; back to their teeth.  

This proves that everything containing the (now finally) meaningless word &quot;standard&quot; is a hollow propaganda that has never had anything to do with true standardization of the browser market. W3C is a disgrace to a moraly standing society of the net for it has become a filthy weapon in the hands of browsers wagging war against a beautifull and a highly capable browser like Explorer 4.01 which by the way stil after 11 years of age is more flexibile and more compliant to the coders needs than W3C CSS3 will ever be.

To hell with all hypocrits and liars. Those who are yelling &quot;standards&quot; can&#039;t have and won&#039;t have opacity simply because it&#039;s a NONSTANDARD feature! This should be clear to every standard hypocrite. You have to decide to either support &quot;standards&quot; that are keeping internet in the era of Jura or to embrace the revolution once started back in 1997 by the only one true Browser: The Internet Explorer.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank god for at last Explorer is finally giving them hypocrites some of their nonsense ““standards”” back to their teeth.  </p>
<p>This proves that everything containing the (now finally) meaningless word “standard” is a hollow propaganda that has never had anything to do with true standardization of the browser market. W3C is a disgrace to a moraly standing society of the net for it has become a filthy weapon in the hands of browsers wagging war against a beautifull and a highly capable browser like Explorer 4.01 which by the way stil after 11 years of age is more flexibile and more compliant to the coders needs than W3C CSS3 will ever be.</p>
<p>To hell with all hypocrits and liars. Those who are yelling “standards” can’t have and won’t have opacity simply because it’s a NONSTANDARD feature! This should be clear to every standard hypocrite. You have to decide to either support “standards” that are keeping internet in the era of Jura or to embrace the revolution once started back in 1997 by the only one true Browser: The Internet Explorer.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter White</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/comment-page-1/#comment-12841</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/#comment-12841</guid>
		<description>This is a fucking disgrace imo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fucking disgrace imo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worst. Announcement.&#160;Ever. &#187; Broken Links</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/comment-page-1/#comment-5406</link>
		<dc:creator>Worst. Announcement.&#160;Ever. &#187; Broken Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/#comment-5406</guid>
		<description>[...] complaints from the web community about lack of transparency in the development of the next Internet Explorer, and a little [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] complaints from the web community about lack of transparency in the development of the next Internet Explorer, and a little […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IE.Next to get a new layout engine &#187; Broken Links</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/comment-page-1/#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>IE.Next to get a new layout engine &#187; Broken Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>[...] take is a strong disclaimer that features were only experimental and not guaranteed for launch. As I said before, even if full Betas were not released, at least an Alpha or two of the layout engine with a basic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] take is a strong disclaimer that features were only experimental and not guaranteed for launch. As I said before, even if full Betas were not released, at least an Alpha or two of the layout engine with a basic […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mysterious</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/comment-page-1/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>mysterious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/09/28/opacity-in-internet-explorer-8-development/#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. It looks like it&#039;s time for the IE team to come back down to earth.

I really get sick of the way they treat us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. It looks like it’s time for the IE team to come back down to earth.</p>
<p>I really get sick of the way they treat us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
