 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The worst rounded corners technique ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broken-links.com/2007/08/01/the-worst-rounded-corners-technique-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/08/01/the-worst-rounded-corners-technique-ever/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-worst-rounded-corners-technique-ever</link>
	<description>Thoughts on web development and technologies by Peter Gasston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/08/01/the-worst-rounded-corners-technique-ever/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 08:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/08/01/the-worst-rounded-corners-technique-ever/#comment-592</guid>
		<description>Hi Josh,

Thanks for the reply. I agree it was an interesting experiment, but perhaps you should have been more explicit in your aims; a lot of your commenters seem keen to get out and use the technique in live environments - and code like this should never be seen in the wild!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josh,</p>
<p>Thanks for the reply. I agree it was an interesting experiment, but perhaps you should have been more explicit in your aims; a lot of your commenters seem keen to get out and use the technique in live environments — and code like this should never be seen in the wild!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh S.</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/08/01/the-worst-rounded-corners-technique-ever/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broken-links.com/2007/08/01/the-worst-rounded-corners-technique-ever/#comment-586</guid>
		<description>At the time it was the best CSS-only rounded corners method available. I&#039;m sure it could have been slimmed, but it wasn&#039;t bad for a first try. It was really an experiment and appeal for someone to help refine it, not something that was meant to be used in any live environment.

I agree there should be an easier way to do this. The CSS3 rounded corner technique will probably work pretty well, but it&#039;ll be a while before it is available on most user&#039;s browsers.

Anyway, while it may or may not be the &quot;worst rounded corners technique ever,&quot; it was only meant to be a &lt;em&gt;CSS/HTML-only&lt;/em&gt; rounded corners technique, and I still haven&#039;t seen any method that is much better semantically that doesn&#039;t use images or javascript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the time it was the best CSS-only rounded corners method available. I’m sure it could have been slimmed, but it wasn’t bad for a first try. It was really an experiment and appeal for someone to help refine it, not something that was meant to be used in any live environment.</p>
<p>I agree there should be an easier way to do this. The CSS3 rounded corner technique will probably work pretty well, but it’ll be a while before it is available on most user’s browsers.</p>
<p>Anyway, while it may or may not be the “worst rounded corners technique ever,” it was only meant to be a <em>CSS/HTML-only</em> rounded corners technique, and I still haven’t seen any method that is much better semantically that doesn’t use images or javascript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
