 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X/HTML 5 Versus XHTML 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broken-links.com/2007/02/06/xhtml-5-versus-xhtml-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/02/06/xhtml-5-versus-xhtml-2/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=xhtml-5-versus-xhtml-2</link>
	<description>Thoughts on web development and technologies by Peter Gasston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:24:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zooplah</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/02/06/xhtml-5-versus-xhtml-2/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>zooplah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 03:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claudiamassera.com/?p=10#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Good article.  Personally, I&#039;m pulling for XHTML 2 (hopefully this decade).  It&#039;s just cleaner and has a more sound principle of reuse.  And as the fastidious perfectionist that I am, I&#039;d root for the strictness of XML any day.  I am, however, disenchanted with the legacy baggage.

However, I think the WHAT language is more likely to succeed.  It&#039;s closer to what we use now (as sucky as that might be) and I don&#039;t think web authors want to change or broaden their work flow or skills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  Personally, I’m pulling for XHTML 2 (hopefully this decade).  It’s just cleaner and has a more sound principle of reuse.  And as the fastidious perfectionist that I am, I’d root for the strictness of XML any day.  I am, however, disenchanted with the legacy baggage.</p>
<p>However, I think the WHAT language is more likely to succeed.  It’s closer to what we use now (as sucky as that might be) and I don’t think web authors want to change or broaden their work flow or skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Piper</title>
		<link>http://www.broken-links.com/2007/02/06/xhtml-5-versus-xhtml-2/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 13:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.claudiamassera.com/?p=10#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Peter,

All of this stuff goes completely over my head, but I would like to pick your brains.

My son is about to leave college and wants to do a web design course, preferably by distance learning because he wants to earn some cash too. Any idea what sort of thing he should be looking for, what qualifications are useful etc?

I would appreciate any guidance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>All of this stuff goes completely over my head, but I would like to pick your brains.</p>
<p>My son is about to leave college and wants to do a web design course, preferably by distance learning because he wants to earn some cash too. Any idea what sort of thing he should be looking for, what qualifications are useful etc?</p>
<p>I would appreciate any guidance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
